Actress Nana is taking a firm legal stance after the man who broke into her home filed a counter lawsuit, a move her agency describes as an attempt to cause further harm to the victim.
On January 2, Nana’s agency SUBLIME released an official statement addressing the situation, emphasizing that the intruder’s criminal actions had already been clearly established through a police investigation. Despite this, the perpetrator has now initiated separate legal action against Nana.
A Violent Crime, Followed by a Legal Reversal
According to SUBLIME, the incident involved a weapon armed intruder who illegally entered Nana’s residence and threatened both Nana and her mother.
“The attacker’s criminal conduct was clearly confirmed by investigative authorities,” the agency stated. “During the incident, Nana and her family suffered severe physical and psychological trauma, the effects of which continue to this day.” However, the agency revealed that the suspect has since filed an additional lawsuit against Nana a move they strongly condemned.
“Secondary Harm Through Inhumane Actions”
SUBLIME did not mince words in its response. “Despite showing no remorse, the perpetrator has filed a separate complaint against Nana, exploiting the fact that she is a public figure,” the agency said. “This constitutes an inhumane act that inflicts secondary harm on the victim.” The agency stressed that it views the counter lawsuit as an extension of the original crime, rather than a legitimate legal dispute.
Agency Vows Full Legal Response
SUBLIME made it clear that Nana will not face the situation alone. “The protection of our artist’s rights is our top priority,” the agency stated. “We will pursue all possible civil and criminal legal actions against the perpetrator and respond with full responsibility to ensure no further damage is inflicted.” The agency added that it will continue to take a zero tolerance approach toward any actions that threaten the safety or dignity of its artists.
What Happened
The home invasion occurred on November 15, 2025, when a man in his 30s illegally entered Nana’s home in Guri, Gyeonggi Province, while carrying a weapon. The suspect attempted to extort money and threatened Nana and her mother.
Nana and her mother fought back, managed to subdue the intruder, and immediately contacted the police. The suspect was arrested at the scene and later detained. Authorities ruled that Nana and her mother acted in legitimate self defense, and no charges were filed against them.
Moving Forward
Although Nana reportedly suffered significant psychological distress following the incident, she announced in late November that she would resume activities. As legal proceedings continue, Nana’s agency has reaffirmed its commitment to protecting her rights signaling that this case will be pursued to the very end.
Editor’s Insight
What makes this situation particularly concerning isn’t just the severity of the original crime, but what followed. The suspect’s decision to file a counter lawsuit highlights an ongoing issue within high-profile cases: the vulnerability of victims to secondary harm through legal retaliation. In cases involving public figures, this dynamic becomes even more complex, as visibility can be exploited to shift narratives or prolong distress.